1998 Audi A6 vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi A6 would be higher. At 2,771 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi A6 (200 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Because 1998 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi A6 (271 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm). This means 1998 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi A6 | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Audi | Honda |
Model | A6 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2771 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 10.4 : 1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2435 mm |