1998 Audi AD vs. 1952 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1952 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | AD | 62 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5425 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |