1998 Audi AD vs. 1957 Talbot 2500
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Talbot 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Talbot 2500 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1957 Talbot 2500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Talbot 2500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1957 Talbot 2500 (196 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1957 Talbot 2500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1957 Talbot 2500 | |
| Make | Audi | Talbot |
| Model | AD | 2500 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1957 |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2490 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 196 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
