1998 Audi AD vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | AD | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
