1998 Audi AD vs. 1964 Toyota Sport 800
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Sport 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Sport 800 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1964 Toyota Sport 800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Toyota Sport 800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi AD (140 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Sport 800. (67 Nm). This means 1998 Audi AD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Sport 800.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1964 Toyota Sport 800 | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | AD | Sport 800 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 790 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 67 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |