1998 Audi AD vs. 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 (194 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1965 Willys-Overland Aero-Willys 2600 | |
| Make | Audi | Willys-Overland |
| Model | AD | Aero-Willys 2600 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2638 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 194 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
