1998 Audi AD vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi AD (140 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (105 Nm). This means 1998 Audi AD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AD | 12 M |
Year Released | 1998 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |