1998 Audi AD vs. 1967 Toyota Crown
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Toyota Crown is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Toyota Crown. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Toyota Crown (157 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1967 Toyota Crown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1967 Toyota Crown | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | AD | Crown |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
