1998 Audi AD vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (233 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | AD | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 233 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
