1998 Audi AD vs. 1976 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-4 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-4 (165 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1976 Mazda RX-4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1976 Mazda RX-4 | |
| Make | Audi | Mazda |
| Model | AD | RX-4 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
