1998 Audi AD vs. 1976 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1976 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | AD | 240 C |
Year Released | 1998 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |