1998 Audi AD vs. 1977 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1977 Datsun 260Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Datsun 260Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Datsun 260Z (213 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1977 Datsun 260Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1977 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | Audi | Datsun |
| Model | AD | 260Z |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2565 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
