1998 Audi AD vs. 1979 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1979 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 1979 Mazda Cosmo has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda Cosmo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1979 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | AD | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1768 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |