1998 Audi AD vs. 1981 De Tomaso Deauville
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 De Tomaso Deauville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 De Tomaso Deauville would be higher. At 5,762 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 De Tomaso Deauville is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 De Tomaso Deauville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 De Tomaso Deauville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 De Tomaso Deauville (450 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1981 De Tomaso Deauville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 1981 De Tomaso Deauville has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 De Tomaso Deauville will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1981 De Tomaso Deauville | |
| Make | Audi | De Tomaso |
| Model | AD | Deauville |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5762 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
