1998 Audi AD vs. 1983 Bitter SC
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Bitter SC would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Bitter SC (248 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1983 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1983 Bitter SC | |
Make | Audi | Bitter |
Model | AD | SC |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2968 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 248 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |