1998 Audi AD vs. 1983 BMW 316
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 140 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1983 BMW 316 | |
Make | Audi | BMW |
Model | AD | 316 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1572 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 88 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 140 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |