1998 Audi AD vs. 1986 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Thunderbird (241 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1986 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1986 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AD | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 241 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |