1998 Audi AD vs. 1986 Opel Omega
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 140 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 1986 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Audi | Opel |
| Model | AD | Omega |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 87 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
