1998 Audi AD vs. 1987 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1987 Ford RS 200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Ford RS 200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford RS 200 (292 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1987 Ford RS 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1987 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AD | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1804 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 247 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 292 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |