1998 Audi AD vs. 1989 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1989 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1989 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Ford Mustang (176 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1989 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1989 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AD | Mustang |
Year Released | 1998 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2299 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |