1998 Audi AD vs. 1990 Holden Commodore
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1990 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Holden Commodore (292 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 1990 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 1990 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | AD | Commodore |
Year Released | 1998 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 168 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 292 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |