1998 Audi AD vs. 2000 Caterham 7
To start off, 2000 Caterham 7 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi AD (140 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 7. (125 Nm). This means 1998 Audi AD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 7.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2000 Caterham 7 | |
Make | Audi | Caterham |
Model | AD | 7 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1137 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 125 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |