1998 Audi AD vs. 2000 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2000 Lotus Exige is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Lotus Exige is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Exige. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus Exige (180 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 2000 Lotus Exige | |
| Make | Audi | Lotus |
| Model | AD | Exige |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
