1998 Audi AD vs. 2000 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Pontiac Trans Am (454 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2000 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 2000 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Audi | Pontiac |
| Model | AD | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5733 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 454 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
