1998 Audi AD vs. 2002 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Cima is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 4,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2002 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | AD | Cima |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 4498 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |