1998 Audi AD vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Audi AD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2002 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | AD | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1998 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 192 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |