1998 Audi AD vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | AD | CTS |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5665 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 396 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
