1998 Audi AD vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | AD | 3 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |