1998 Audi AD vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi AD (140 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 1998 Audi AD will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2009 Tata Nano | |
Make | Audi | Tata |
Model | AD | Nano |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 48 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |