1998 Audi AD vs. 2009 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2009 Toyota Tundra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Tundra (545 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2009 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 2009 Toyota Tundra has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Toyota Tundra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2009 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | AD | Tundra |
Year Released | 1998 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Type | electric | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 545 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |