1998 Audi AD vs. 2010 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2010 Nissan Titan is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 5,598 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Nissan Titan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Nissan Titan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan Titan (385 Nm) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 2010 Nissan Titan has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Nissan Titan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 2010 Nissan Titan | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | AD | Titan |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5598 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 313 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 385 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
