1998 Audi AD vs. 2012 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2012 Suzuki Kizashi is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Audi AD. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2012 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2012 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Audi | Suzuki |
Model | AD | Kizashi |
Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |