1998 Audi AD vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Dodge CHARGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHARGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD. 2013 Dodge CHARGER has automatic transmission and 1998 Audi AD has manual transmission. 1998 Audi AD will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHARGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AD | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
| Make | Audi | Dodge |
| Model | AD | CHARGER |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Type | electric | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 288 HP |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
