1998 Audi AD vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AD would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2013 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (625 Nm) has 485 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AD. (140 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AD.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AD | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | AD | XK |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Type | electric | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 503 HP |
Torque | 140 Nm | 625 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |