1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 1,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Maserati A6GCM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Audi AL2 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1953 Maserati A6GCM has manual transmission. 1953 Maserati A6GCM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
Make | Audi | Maserati |
Model | AL2 | A6GCM |
Year Released | 1998 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 194 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2290 mm |