1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1964 Maserati Mistral

To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Maserati Mistral. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Maserati Mistral would be higher. At 3,486 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Maserati Mistral is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Maserati Mistral (232 HP) has 158 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Maserati Mistral should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Maserati Mistral weights approximately 424 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Maserati Mistral is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Maserati Mistral. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Maserati Mistral (315 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm). This means 1964 Maserati Mistral will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2. 1998 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1964 Maserati Mistral has manual transmission. 1964 Maserati Mistral will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: