1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1964 Simca 1300
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Simca 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Simca 1300 would be higher. At 1,290 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Simca 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Audi AL2 (74 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1964 Simca 1300. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2 should accelerate faster than 1964 Simca 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Simca 1300 weights approximately 174 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2.
Because 1964 Simca 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Simca 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Audi AL2 (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Simca 1300. (102 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1998 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Simca 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1964 Simca 1300 | |
Make | Audi | Simca |
Model | AL2 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1998 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 51 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2530 mm |