1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1983 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1983 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1134 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2.
Because 1983 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1983 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | AL2 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1998 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5032 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3090 mm |