1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1985 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,833 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1985 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1985 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1985 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | AL2 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1998 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2833 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |