1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 289 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AL2 | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | AL2 | Tempo |
| Year Released | 1998 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2307 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
