1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1991 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Holden Apollo (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Holden Apollo weights approximately 389 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Holden Apollo (171 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1991 Holden Apollo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1991 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | AL2 | Apollo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |