1998 Audi AL2 vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1998 Audi AL2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Tempo (96 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 354 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | AL2 | Tempo |
Year Released | 1998 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |