1998 Audi AL2 vs. 2004 Buick LeSabre
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 801 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AL2 | 2004 Buick LeSabre | |
| Make | Audi | Buick |
| Model | AL2 | LeSabre |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 205 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1617 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2810 mm |
