1998 Audi AL2 vs. 2006 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2006 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 776 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2.
Because 2006 Cadillac Escalade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac Escalade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 400 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 2006 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | AL2 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 515 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3310 mm |