1998 Audi AL2 vs. 2006 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2006 GMC Canyon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Canyon (175 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 GMC Canyon weights approximately 1761 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 GMC Canyon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Canyon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Canyon (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Canyon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AL2 | 2006 GMC Canyon | |
| Make | Audi | GMC |
| Model | AL2 | Canyon |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2770 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 175 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 2577 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3210 mm |
