1998 Audi AL2 vs. 2011 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2011 Fiat Croma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Croma (146 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Croma weights approximately 124 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AL2 | 2011 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | Audi | Fiat |
| Model | AL2 | Croma |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 146 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
