1998 Audi AL2 vs. 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2.
Because 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm). This means 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Audi AL2 | 2012 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Audi | Jeep |
| Model | AL2 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1958 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1755 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2916 mm |
