1998 Audi AL2 vs. 2013 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2013 Chrysler 200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chrysler 200 (171 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1998 Audi AL2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 727 kg more than 1998 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chrysler 200 (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Audi AL2. (115 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Audi AL2 | 2013 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | AL2 | 200 |
Year Released | 1998 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 171 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1543 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2121 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2765 mm |