1998 Bentley Turbo vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Bentley Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Bentley Turbo would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Bentley Turbo (395 HP @ 4150 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1998 Bentley Turbo should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Bentley Turbo weights approximately 91 kg more than 2005 Ford E-250. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Bentley Turbo (800 Nm) has 412 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 1998 Bentley Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 1998 Bentley Turbo | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Bentley | Ford |
| Model | Turbo | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1998 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 395 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 800 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2395 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2120 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 132 L |
