1998 Bentley Turbo vs. 2006 Chevrolet HHR
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Bentley Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Bentley Turbo would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Bentley Turbo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Bentley Turbo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Bentley Turbo (800 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 597 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Chevrolet HHR. (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1998 Bentley Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Chevrolet HHR.
Compare all specifications:
1998 Bentley Turbo | 2006 Chevrolet HHR | |
Make | Bentley | Chevrolet |
Model | Turbo | HHR |
Year Released | 1998 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 800 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2120 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 94 L | 68 L |